
Photo by Ruth Fremson/The New York Times. From global.nytimes.com
Maybe it's all those endorphins from the new exercise, but I felt happy today.
For the first time in a while, I really enjoyed reading all our stories and feel proud of the newspaper we write, edit and design.
Don't get me wrong. I am generally proud of what we do. But it's easy to get dragged down by the daily grind of deadlines, budget cuts and long hours. Newsrooms are usually pretty glum, sarcastic places. Plus, this week, everyone is sharing the same miserable cold/flu.
So, sometimes, I drag through the stories. They either don't personally interest me, or the whole thing is just too much.
As I've blogged abefore, 8, 9, hours of death and destruction can be hard emotionally. It's nice to have a nice day.
***
In the meeting where we discuss our page 1 choices, we talked about how big the Obama/ Afghan story was, compared to the climate talk stuff.
I have smart colleagues, so it's nice when we get a good, healthy discussion going.
***
Obama wants to pour in lots more troops now, so the U.S. can eventually get out earlier. His goal is to hit the war hard and fast. (As opposed to sloppy and prolonged, as it was under Bush. Can you believe it's been on EIGHT years?)
***
I think Obama's Afghan decision may be the biggest of his presidency.
World leaders have been made -- or broken -- by grand decisions on war. Three years from now, we may look back and see, in retrospect, that this was the most significant thing he did.
Or the worst thing he did.
In any case, it's a big deal.
***
The front page due out tomorrow morning (Thursday) looks great.
(Not thanks to me, but our talented page 1 editor).
He designed a long, horizontal photo of Obama with what looks like spotlights behind him. Below are smaller photos -- of U.S. military students who might fight in Afghanistan someday, and anti-war protesters against the war.
The viewer's eye would move over these three images and -- in a glance -- get three different viewpoints.
Something else I like: We have different views. One columnist said he was absolutely against Obama's move. Other articles in the news section are not so critical.
(Could you imagine a Chinese newspaper running several articles about something Hu Jintao did -- one taking a pro-stance,one taking an anti-stance?)
***
Because of technical reasons, we had more room for articles in the Thursday paper, which causes grumbling in the newsroom, because it means more work.
But it also means more for the reader to read.
In terms of density, I've always thought of the IHT as the newspaper equivalent of The New Yorker.
I always bring The New Yorker on flights because it's very thin, but absolutely packed with words. It can last me hours. (The opposite would be Vogue, which is giant, but takes 15 minutes)
The IHT is thin -- 20, 24 pages? But it's jammed packed -- lots of articles, long articles, dense, concise writing.
A friend joked that he started reading one of our essays and, when his Hong Kong-Singapore flight landed, he was just finishing it. (OK, our articles aren't that long)
The length is by design. After all, if you just wanted quick, superficial news flashes, you'd check the BBC or CNN websites. It's only newspapers and magazines that can give deeper analysis.
***
This is what we decided on.
Page 1: Obama/Afghan. The environmental talks.
On the hard side: Pakistan had yet another attack. Iran frees British soldiers.
On the light side: A feature on oyster farming in Texas. A rare upbeat report on Iraq filmmakers turning bomb sites into movie screening areas.
In Asia: The Japanese prime minister's new troubles. A quirky American woman who has joined the unwashed masses to be a campaigner seeking justice in Beijing. (Actually, this came from the AP).
Then there's the weird health story on why people keep repeating ourselves, and why we forget what stories we've told to whom. (Impending senility, I presume.)
***
I hope this didn't come off as an IHT infomercial. (That wasn't the point).
Joyceyland readers can let me know if these "insider's views of a newsroom" posts are of any interest at all.
***
I already know what's going in the paper tomorrow. But I still like picking it up in the morning and reading it over coffee. Habit, I guess.

